The Internal Combustion Engine
The conventional Internal Combustion Engine, ICE, has been around since 1876 when Nicolaus Otto invented the 4 stroke "Otto"-motor. As soon as it was built Daimler (yes that Daimler) built it into a 2 wheeler - a "motor"-cycle.
The 4 stroke "Otto"-motor carries out four piston strokes during one combustion cycle - Intake Stroke, Compression Stroke, Power Stroke and Exhaust Stroke.
A good animation of the
"Otto" 4 -stroke cycle
can be found at Matt Keveney's excellent engine animation site.
With better production methods and cheap fuel (petrol and diesel) the "Otto"-engine won the race and has dominated, were ever there was a need for portable power, for more than a century.
Many designs competed with the "Otto"-motor in the early years and many designs have tried and failed over the years. There are however some specialized niches where the competition has succeeded.
Gas-turbines found their niche in Helicopters and in a few Battle-Tanks. The Jet engines (turbine) and Turboprop engines (essentially a turbine with a propeller attached to the mainshaft)in Aviation. The automotive arena has however been totally dedicated to the 4-stroke Otto-motor.
A notable exception is the Wankel engine which has been produced for automotive application by, at first DKW, then VW and later Mazda for over 50 years. Still in relatively small numbers! I even have a picture of a 70's Chevrolet Corvette prototype utilizing a 3-rotor Wankel engine.
What made, and still makes, the "Otto"-motor so popular is that it:
- has fairly good thermodynamic efficiency
- has an excellent power-to-weight ratio
- is reliable due to relatively simple operation
- is "well understood"
- is relatively inexpensive to produce
In addition its characteristics:
- mate well to the mechanical drive train deployed in most vehicles
- meets, reasonably well, the operation requirements of most vehicle applications.
This is about to change, hybrid vehicles have different requirements than their mechanical counterparts.
An ICE in a hybrid vehicle is required to produce electricity or hydraulic pressure depending on the drive train technology (traction motors) deployed.
The exception are the serial hybrids. They need to have some of the traditional characteristics intact as the engine is required to supplement the electric traction motors in driving the vehicle and in some applications drive the vehicle fully without electric assistance.
This means the engine is not the only source of power and therefore can be smaller and driven, when it is powered on, in its most efficient operations range - where it gives the most bang (or power) for the buck!
All the variability needed due to terrain or traffic can be handled by the traction motors.
Several of the current hybrid vehicles, vehicles like the
Prius, use Atkinson cycle engines in stead of the conventional Otto-cycle. See an animation of the
again from Matt Keveney's excellent engine animation site.
The Atkinson-cycle engine is up to 10% more efficient than a conventional four-stroke petrol "Otto" engine. The increase in efficiency comes mainly from controlling the so called pumping losses.
Pumping losses are caused by the way power output from a petrol "Otto" engine is regulated. It is regulated by controlling, or rather constricting airflow to the engine. This constriction of airflow creates partial vacuum (low pressure) in the inlet manifold. Maintaining this "low pressure" in the inlet manifold wastes energy.
One reason for diesel "Otto"-engines being more effective than the corresponding petrol engines is because there is no pumping loss in a diesel as power is regulated by injecting less fuel into the cylinders and not by choking the airflow to the cylinders.
The pumping losses in an Atkinson cycle engine are reduced by allowing, in the compression stroke, a small amount of the fuel/air mixture to flow back from the cylinder into the induction system, without being burned, thus reducing the effective displacement of the engine.
Additionally as the expansion ratio of an Atkinson cycle engine is greater than its compression ratio it takes more heat from the exhaust gas instead of pumping it into the exhaust system, thereby achieving additional efficiency.
The Atkinson cycle — also called the "five-stroke cycle" (because of the backflow which is really not a cycle) — works like this: intake, backflow (partial expulsion to eliminate pumping losses), compression, expansion, and exhaust.
The combustion chamber volume is adapted to maintain a constant compression ratio to avoid knock while increasing the expansion ratio to optimize efficiency.
In the case of the
Ford Escape Hybrid,
engineers convert the Zetec I-4 engine to an Atkinson cycle by changing the intake camshaft to one with a very late valve closing and installing pistons that decrease combustion clearance volume. These changes result in a higher, 12.3:1 compression ratio.
The Hydrogen ICE
There is not much difference between an Internal CombustionEngine that runs on hydrogen compared to an ICE that runs on petrol/gasoline. The main differences are regarding efficiency, emission levels and fuel storage.
Hydrogen has lower energy density and burns faster and hotter than gasoline. So compression ratios can be increased and more air can be mixed with the fuel, resulting in cooler running and lower exhaust emission than a comparable petrol/gasoline ICE.
As most hydrogen engines run lean, air-to-fuel ratio of 30:1 or more, and as hydrogen, which is gaseous, displaces the oxygen in the cylinders, a supercharger is often needed to achieve the required power output. Once the pre-requisites are in place the hydrogen ICE is highly fuel efficient — up to 25% better than conventional petrol/gasoline ICE's.
Hydrogen storage is however an issue. Lower energy density means that hydrogen tanks require more space if a comparable range is to be achieved. Storing hydrogen as a liquid reduces the size but requires that the tanks tolerate high pressure (up to 700 bar /1000 psi). Because hydrogen is a gas at normal temperatures there is a high risk of explosion if a hydrogen vehicle is involved in an accident. Different methods to slow the release of hydrogen from a ruptured tank are being tested. One of these methods is to store the hydrogen in a kind of metallic matrix or “sponge”.
An iron sponge can be used as a hydrogen storage material. Hydrogen and „rust" (Fe3O4) are converted into pure iron („iron sponge") which is transported to the hydrogen consumption site. In the reverse reaction (oxidation) „rust" is produced liberating the hydrogen. The iron sponge storage can also be filled/ loaded with synthesis gas (mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide) also liberating pure hydrogen in the reverse reaction. Iron sponge storage is in an early stage of development.
Many see the main advantages of the hydrogen ICE in the potential to use it to build momentum for a hydrogen fueling infrastructure and thereby create the bridge between today's gasoline-powered ICE's and tomorrow's hydrogen-powered fuel cell vehicles.
Other advantages of the Hydrogen ICE's are that:
they can run on a blend of hydrogen and compressed natural gas
they perform well under all weather conditions,
they require no warm-up and have no cold-start issues (even at subzero temperatures).
Who is building hydrogen ICE powered vehicles?
BMW built its first modern hydrogen-powered ICE prototype in the 1970s. In 2000, nearly 30 years later, the company introduced a prototype version of the hydrogen-powered BMW 750hl, followed by the dual-fuel (hydrogen and gasoline) 745h in 2001. In 2001, the company also unveiled a hydrogen-powered Mini Cooper concept car.
BMW has published papers showing impressive technical advances fromhydrogen-fueled engines and that the theoretical efficiency of direct-injected hydrogen engines is above 60% — about the same as a fuel cell.
Ford Motor Company also sees promise in hydrogen ICE technology. The company's first modern hydrogen ICE automobile, the P2000, debuted in 2001, followed by the Focus-based H2RVin 2003. The H2 RV combines a 2.3-liter hydrogen ICE (H2ICE),boosted by a supercharger, with a patented Modular Hybrid Transmission System.
According to Ford spokespersons the H2ICE's can easily hit Sulev emissions
(Sulev Bin 2 or Tier 2 emissions standards)
, or better, and more than 99% reduced CO2 vehicle emissions. Performance is comparable to gasoline, while fuel economy increases up to 25% with the engine only and up to 50% better with an aggressive hybrid-electric strategy.
Ford's 2003 Model U hydrogen ICE concept vehicle
At the Detroit Auto Show in 2003, Ford introduced Model U, a concept hybrid hydrogen ICE sport-utility vehicle that showcases many new technologies. Model U incorporates a 2.3-liter, four-cylinder supercharged, inter cooled hydrogen internal combustion engine, coupled with Ford's Modular Hybrid Transmission System. It also offers enhanced fuel economy — the equivalent of 45 miles per gallon and about 300 miles of range — plus near-zero regulated emissions and a 99% reduction in carbon dioxide. The Model U draws from a number of Ford and Mazda engine designs, resulting in a powerful, fuel-efficient, zero-emissions vehicle.
Submit an ICE article!
You are welcome to submit an article.